Skip to main content
Glama
dbe006

rugguard-mcp

by dbe006
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Local

Related Servers

Alternatives to rugguard-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • SENTRA MCP

      SentraMCP
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      An MCP server that detects potential risks in Solana meme tokens using Solsniffer API, helping AI agents avoid rug pulls and unsafe projects.
      MIT

    • token-rugcheck

      AetherCore-Dev
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      MCP server for real-time Solana token risk analysis. Cross-references RugCheck.xyz, DexScreener, and GoPlus Security to generate three-layer reports: machine verdict → LLM analysis → raw on-chain evidence. Live on Solana mainnet with USDC micropayments ($0.02/audit). Give any AI agent the ability to check if a token is safe before trading.
      2
      MIT

    • onchain-safety-mcp

      aitools420
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      MCP server that provides AI agents with crypto token safety checks (honeypot, liquidity, rug risk) and alpha signals (smart money buys, fresh rug radar) across PulseChain, Monad, Base, and BSC.
      51 npm
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A4.7/5.0

    Scored across 3 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool serves a clearly distinct purpose: scanning a token, explaining scan results, and providing a prescriptive trade decision. There is no overlap between their functionalities.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tool names follow a consistent verb_noun pattern using snake_case: scan_token, explain_scan, pretrade_check. The naming is predictable and clear.

    Tool Count5/5

    With 3 tools, the server is tightly scoped to its purpose of token risk scanning and compliance. Each tool earns its place without redundancy or deficiency.

    Completeness4/5

    The tool surface covers the core workflow (scan, explain, prescriptive decision). Minor gaps exist, such as no ability to update or rescan, but these are not critical for the primary use case.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources