No user-submitted related servers found.
Scored across 2 tools
The two tools have clearly distinct purposes: one starts a new conversation and returns a thread_id, the other continues an existing conversation using that thread_id. There is no overlap or ambiguity between them.
Both tool names follow the same verb_noun pattern with snake_case, using 'start_new_' and 'continue_' as clear action prefixes. This consistency makes the API predictable and easy to navigate.
At only two tools, the count is on the low end but perfectly appropriate for the server's narrow purpose of managing Codex conversations. The tools cover the essential start/continue workflow without unnecessary additions.
The tool surface covers the primary conversation lifecycle (start and continue) with no dead ends. Minor gaps such as the absence of explicit conversation termination or history listing are acceptable given the read-only, session-based scope.