GitHub Mapper MCP Server
Related Servers
Alternatives to GitHub Mapper MCP Server
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceEnables access to GitHub repositories and data through the GitHub API. Supports retrieving repositories, issues, pull requests, and searching code across GitHub with authentication via personal access tokens.-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceProvides tools to access GitHub repository and user statistics, including repo info, user profiles, contributors, issues, and repository search.MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables AI agents to interact with GitHub, providing tools to list and get repository details using a personal access token.64 npmISC
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceEnables Large Language Models to analyze GitHub repositories in real-time, providing tools for retrieving repository information, analyzing issues, accessing documentation, and visualizing activity.-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceEnables AI assistants to analyze GitHub repositories, including fetching repository details, searching, and retrieving README content.379 npm2ISC
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceEnables AI assistants to analyze GitHub repository structures and read file contents with features like directory traversal, file type analysis, syntax highlighting, and code pattern detection. Supports both public and private repositories through GitHub API integration.2 npmApache 2.0
TDQS
Scored across 2 tools
The two tools have completely distinct purposes: one maps repository structures, while the other handles authentication. There is no overlap or ambiguity between them, making it easy for an agent to select the correct tool based on the task.
The tools use a mixed naming convention: 'map-github-repo' follows a verb-noun pattern with hyphens, while 'set-github-token' uses a verb-noun pattern but with a different structure. This inconsistency in style (hyphenated vs. standard verb_noun) reduces predictability, though both are readable.
With only 2 tools, the server feels thin for a GitHub-related domain, which typically involves operations like creating, updating, or deleting repositories, issues, or pull requests. The limited scope may hinder comprehensive agent workflows, as core functionalities are missing.
The server covers authentication and repository mapping but lacks essential GitHub operations such as CRUD for repositories, issues, or pull requests. This creates significant gaps that will likely cause agent failures when attempting common tasks like creating an issue or fetching repository details beyond structure.