Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to Copper MCP

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      MCP server that connects to a sales CRM database, enabling AI agents to search prospects, view pipeline status, manage follow-ups, and update records using natural language commands.
      5
      73 npm
      ISC
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      An MCP server that lets AI agents search contacts, manage the call queue, log activities, and update deal stages in a CRM while preventing destructive actions and email sending.
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      MCP server for the Nimble CRM API that enables managing contacts, deals, pipelines, notes, tasks, tags, fields metadata, and message drafts from any MCP client.
      62
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      An MCP server for interacting with Keap CRM, enabling contact and tag management, batch operations, custom fields, and advanced query optimization.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      MCP server for the Nimble CRM API, enabling management of contacts, deals, notes, tasks, and tags through natural language.
      MIT
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A comprehensive MCP server for Bitrix24 CRM integration that enables AI agents to manage contacts, deals, tasks, leads, and companies. It also provides advanced tools for sales team monitoring, performance analytics, and automated CRM search capabilities.
      11 npm
      -

    TDQS

    A3.7/5.0

    Scored across 9 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose with no ambiguity. For example, create_activity, list_activities, and list_activity_types all handle activities but with specific roles (creation, searching, and type listing), while person/company/opportunity tools target different CRM entities. The descriptions clearly differentiate overlapping domains like search_people vs get_person.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tools follow a consistent verb_noun naming pattern throughout, such as create_activity, list_activities, search_companies, and update_person. There are no deviations in style or convention, making the set predictable and easy to navigate for an agent.

    Tool Count5/5

    With 9 tools, the count is well-scoped for a CRM server, covering core entities like people, companies, activities, and opportunities. Each tool earns its place by providing essential CRUD and search operations without redundancy or bloat.

    Completeness4/5

    The tool surface is largely complete for CRM operations, offering create, get, update, and search for people and activities, plus search for companies and opportunities. A minor gap exists in lacking update/delete for companies and opportunities, but agents can work around this with existing tools for basic workflows.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues