browser_release
Release a provisioned browser session to the pool, freeing resources for other requests.
Instructions
Release a provisioned browser back to the pool.
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| session_id | No |
Release a provisioned browser session to the pool, freeing resources for other requests.
Release a provisioned browser back to the pool.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| session_id | No |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
The description only states 'release', but does not disclose if the browser is destroyed, connections closed, or if it's irreversible. With no annotations, the description carries the full burden and provides minimal behavioral context.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is a single, direct sentence with no wasted words, achieving maximum conciseness.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
For a simple tool with one optional parameter and no output schema, the description is still insufficient; it omits prerequisites (e.g., valid session), return value, and side effects.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema coverage is 0% and the description does not explain the session_id parameter, its purpose, or when it can be null. The parameter is optional and nullable, but no guidance is given.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the verb 'release' and the resource 'provisioned browser' and the action 'back to the pool', which distinguishes it from sibling tools like browser_provision (create) and browser_list_sessions (list).
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance is provided on when to use this tool, such as after acquiring a session via browser_provision, or not to use if the browser is not provisioned. Lacks context for appropriate use.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/dawgswarm/dawg-mcp'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server