Skip to main content
Glama
davidray

Peek

by davidray
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Local

Related Servers

Alternatives to Peek

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • MCP Webcam Server

      evalstate
      A
      license
      B
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables users to send live webcam images to Claude Desktop or other MCP clients, facilitating interaction through capturing images, screenshots, and providing a webcam view for visual input.
      2
      12 npm
      121
      MIT

    • screenshot-mcp

      937327493
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to capture screenshots of windows (e.g., WeChat developer tools) and save them locally, allowing the agent to read the image directly and close the code-change-to-review loop without OSS or network.
      1
      -

    • camera-mcp

      u1f992
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      An MCP server that enables interaction with local camera devices to capture and process images. It allows LLMs to access video devices with configurable settings such as resolution, orientation, and image format.
      1
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A4.4/5.0

    Scored across 1 tool

    Disambiguation5/5

    With only one tool, there is no possibility of confusion or overlap between tools. The tool has a clear, single purpose of capturing a photo, so an agent cannot misselect among alternatives. This is a perfect disambiguation score by virtue of having a single tool.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    The single tool name 'peek' is a clear verb that describes the action, and it is not inconsistent with any other tools since there are none. While there is no pattern to evaluate, the name is intuitive and aligns with the tool's purpose, so a slightly above-average score is appropriate.

    Tool Count3/5

    The server has only one tool, which is at the lower boundary of what is considered reasonable. For a very narrow purpose like taking a photo, one tool might be sufficient, but it feels thin compared to more comprehensive servers. This aligns with the 'borderline' rating for 1-2 tools.

    Completeness4/5

    The tool fully covers its intended use case of capturing a photo, including options for resolution and camera selection. Minor gaps exist, such as no ability to list available cameras or adjust other settings, but these are not critical for the core functionality. The surface is complete for a single-action server.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources