Skip to main content
Glama
davidpoza

qa-mcp

by davidpoza
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
TypeScript
Local

Related Servers

Alternatives to qa-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • API Tester MCP

      kirti676
      A
      license
      B
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables QA/SDET engineers to test APIs by ingesting Swagger/OpenAPI specs and Postman collections, generating and executing tests in multiple languages and frameworks with real-time progress tracking.
      11
      34 npm
      82 PyPI
      6
      MIT

    • AIQUAA Playwright MCP Server

      stevenayal
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Converts requirements into traceable, CI-ready Playwright BDD tests connected to business rules, with support for Gherkin generation, rule mapping, and automated test pipelines.
      10 npm
      MIT

    • qa-ai-agents

      abchahal
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables automated QA testing by running a pipeline of AI agents that generate test scenarios, architect test layers, write Playwright tests, and review code, all grounded in feature requirements and API contracts.
      -
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    C2.8/5.0

    Scored across 5 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    The tools are mostly distinct: autoCompleteRfCu for document completion, exports to two formats (Excel/Word), and two test generators (E2E/API). The export pair could be confused by name alone, but descriptions clarify the format difference.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tool names follow a consistent camelCase pattern with verb+object (autoComplete, export, generate). Abbreviations like RfCu, ETP, Excel, Word, E2E, Rest are used consistently. No mixing of styles.

    Tool Count5/5

    5 tools is well-scoped for a QA server covering document management, export, and test generation. Not too few or too many.

    Completeness3/5

    The tools cover test preparation and generation but lack execution, reporting, or defect management. Could be more complete for a QA server, but covers core generation tasks.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources