Skip to main content
Glama

Withings Weekly Wellness Review

withings_weekly_summary
Read-onlyIdempotent

Generate a weekly health scorecard covering sleep, activity, body measures, bottlenecks, and suggested actions. Use adjustable time windows and optional period comparison.

Instructions

Build a weekly Withings scorecard with sleep, activity, body measures, bottlenecks and actions. Read-only and non-medical.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
daysNoRecent analysis window in days.
timezoneNoIANA timezone used only for display, e.g. America/New_York.UTC
compare_daysNoPrior comparison window in days. Use 0 to disable comparison.
response_formatNomarkdown

Output Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
kindYes
generated_atYes
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already provide readOnlyHint, idempotentHint, etc. The description adds non-medical disclaimer and summarizes the content, providing extra behavioral context without contradiction.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is brief (two sentences) and front-loaded with the main purpose. No unnecessary words, though it could be slightly more structured with bullet points.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness3/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the presence of output schema and annotations, the description is adequate but lacks guidance on when to prefer this over related siblings. It does not explain how the scorecard is generated or any limitations.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 75%, with all four parameters having descriptions. The tool description does not add further parameter-specific details, so baseline 3 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states it builds a weekly scorecard including sleep, activity, body measures, bottlenecks, and actions. It uses a specific verb 'build' and resource 'weekly scorecard', distinguishing it from daily summary or other tools.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines3/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description mentions 'Read-only and non-medical' but does not explicitly state when to use this tool over alternatives like withings_daily_summary. No guidance on when not to use or preferred contexts.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/davidmosiah/withings-mcp'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server