Update Delx Wellness Profile

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Describes partial patch semantics, required flag, and field restrictions, adding value beyond annotations which only show non-readonly nature. Lacks return value or error details.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Multiple sentences front-load the core action, but could be more structured (e.g., bullet points). No superfluous content.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Covers key aspects: purpose, constraints, typical uses. Missing output description, but acceptable given no output schema and moderate complexity.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Adds structure for the patch object by listing top-level keys, and schema already documents response_format enum and explicit_user_intent constraint.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool persists a partial patch to a specific file, lists updateable content categories, and distinguishes from sibling 'get' tool.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Explicitly requires explicit_user_intent flag and rejects secret fields, but could mention when to avoid using (e.g., if no user intent) or alternatives like profile_get for reading.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.