Skip to main content
Glama
davidmosiah

MCP Scorecard

by davidmosiah
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
TypeScript
Hybrid

Related Servers

Alternatives to MCP Scorecard

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • CheckMCP

      H129hj
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      A vendor-neutral audit tool that evaluates MCP servers for security, quality, and context cost, producing an MCP Score with actionable insights.
      MIT

    • Obra CTO

      lilycip
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A local-first MCP server that scores your codebase's Build Readiness by reading code and running tests on your machine, outputting a diligence-grade score and risk register without uploading your source.
      5
      53 npm
      Apache 2.0

    • MCP Sentinel

      pasihaka
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Autonomous synthetic health checks, JSON-RPC 2.0 handshake validation, breaking schema drift detection, and credential leak scanning for remote MCP servers.
      5
      3
      19 npm
      1
      Apache 2.0

    • mcp-security-audit

      LuciferForge
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Security auditor for MCP servers that enumerates tools, resources, and prompts, scans for injection patterns, classifies risk levels, and produces a scored report (0-100, grades A-F).
      2
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A4.6/5.0

    Scored across 1 tool

    Disambiguation5/5

    Only one tool exists, so there is no ambiguity between tools.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    With a single tool, naming consistency is inherently perfect.

    Tool Count3/5

    A single tool is borderline for a server that could potentially offer multiple audit-related operations, but it is still acceptable for a focused scope.

    Completeness4/5

    The audit tool covers the core functionality of grading and providing itemized checks, but lacks separate tools for metadata or configuration, which would enhance completeness.

    Maintenance

    ActivityActive
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources