util_uuid_generate
Generate one or more UUIDv4 strings for creating unique identifiers.
Instructions
Generate one or more UUIDv4 strings.
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| arguments | Yes |
Generate one or more UUIDv4 strings for creating unique identifiers.
Generate one or more UUIDv4 strings.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| arguments | Yes |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations are provided, and the description only states the basic function. It does not disclose randomness guarantees, error behavior, or any nuances of the generation process, leaving the agent uninformed.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is a single sentence with no fluff, but it is under-specified. It earns its place by stating the core purpose, but lacks structure to convey additional important details.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given the simple but generic schema and lack of output schema, the description is insufficient. It does not explain input format, number of UUIDs generated, or return format, leaving significant gaps for the agent.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema coverage is 0% and the description adds no parameter meaning. The sole parameter 'arguments' is a generic object with additionalProperties true, and the description does not clarify what keys or values are accepted.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states 'Generate one or more UUIDv4 strings', specifying the verb and resource. It distinguishes this tool from other utility siblings which are mostly inspection or transformation tools.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives or when not to use it. The description lacks usage context, leaving the agent without direction on selection.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/davidmosiah/delx-agent-utilities'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server