Skip to main content
Glama
davidfstr
by davidfstr

Related Servers

Alternatives to Revise MCP

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Provides evidence-backed, transactional code refactoring for JavaScript/TypeScript and other languages via MCP, enabling semantic renames, signature changes, edits, and safe bulk operations with preview, atomic apply, and rollback.
      47 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      AST-targeted code editing MCP server with 28 surgical tools for structural edits across 11 languages. Built on tree-sitter, replaces brittle search/replace with byte-correct edits keyed by symbol names.
      28
      MIT
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Provides code intelligence by indexing source code into SQLite and offering MCP tools for symbol search, flow tracing, and context retrieval to assist with code navigation and understanding.
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Provides IDE-like coding capabilities for AI agents via MCP, enabling semantic code retrieval, symbol-level editing, refactoring, and navigation across many programming languages.
      MIT
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      MCP wrapper for Metals (Scala language server) that adds file editing and refactoring tools such as rename-symbol, add-import, and remove-unused-imports.
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables parsing, indexing, and querying source code as structured knowledge, providing code exploration, spec generation, and migration tools via 20 MCP tools.
      MIT

    TDQS

    A4.2/5.0

    Scored across 4 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool addresses a distinct editing operation: indentation, moving lines, outlining, and renaming. No overlap or confusion among them.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tool names follow a consistent verb_noun pattern with underscores (e.g., indent_dedent, move_string_in_file), making them predictable and readable.

    Tool Count5/5

    With 4 tools, the server is well-scoped for a focused code editing purpose, not too few or too many.

    Completeness2/5

    The server lacks basic text editing tools like replace, insert, or delete, which are essential for comprehensive file editing. The mention of 'replace_string_in_file' in descriptions suggests a gap.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues