set_temporal_ease

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are present, so the description must fully disclose behavior. It merely states the action without explaining side effects (e.g., whether it modifies existing ease or adds new data), required conditions (e.g., keyframe existence), or the role of parameters like inSpeed/outSpeed. This is insufficient for a mutation tool.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single short sentence, which is concise but at the expense of missing critical details about parameters and behavior. It is not well-structured for a complex tool; every word should earn its place, but here brevity hinders utility.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the high parameter count (10), lack of output schema, no annotations, and numerous sibling tools, the description is grossly incomplete. It omits essential context about parameter semantics, behavioral traits, and usage scenarios, making it inadequate for correct agent invocation.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0%, meaning the schema only provides parameter names and types. The description adds no explanation for any of the 10 parameters (e.g., inSpeed, outInfluence). The agent cannot infer their meaning from the description alone.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the action ('Set temporal ease') and the target ('on a keyframe'), making the purpose specific. However, it does not explicitly distinguish from sibling tools like 'set_keyframe_advanced' or 'apply_easy_ease', so it falls short of a 5.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives. There is no mention of prerequisites, context, or scenarios where 'set_temporal_ease' is preferred over other keyframe manipulation tools.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.