apply_easy_ease

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description carries the full burden of behavioral disclosure, but it only states the action without explaining side effects, scope (all keyframes by default), or whether it overwrites existing easing values. It does not describe what happens to the property or whether it is reversible.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is extremely short and free of fluff, which is efficient, but it is under-specified. One four-word sentence is not enough to serve as a complete tool description, so conciseness comes at the expense of necessary content.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a tool with 7 parameters, one required parameter, no annotations, and no output schema, this description is insufficient. It omits prerequisites, behavior with omitted optional parameters, return values, and any error conditions, leaving the agent unable to confidently invoke the tool without guessing.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is only 14% (only keyframeIndex is documented), and the description adds no parameter-level meaning. The tool name and description repeat the obvious purpose but do not explain `property`, `type`, `compId`, `layerName`, or the interaction between `keyframeIndex` and the rest.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description 'Apply easy ease to keyframes' uses a specific verb and resource, clearly indicating it changes keyframe interpolation to an easy ease easing type. It is distinct from sibling tools like set_keyframe or set_temporal_ease, though it doesn't explicitly mention the optional single-keyframe scope.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is given for when to use this tool versus alternatives such as set_temporal_ease or set_keyframe_advanced. The description only implies its purpose through the name and phrase, but provides no explicit when-to-use or when-not-to-use context.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.