Skip to main content
Glama
datgfg

Datadog MCP Server

by datgfg

Related Servers

Alternatives to Datadog MCP Server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • F
      license
      B
      quality
      F
      maintenance
      Enables comprehensive Datadog monitoring capabilities including CI/CD pipeline management, service logs analysis, metrics querying, monitor and SLO management, service definitions retrieval, and team management through Claude and other MCP clients.
      13
      20
      -
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to search logs, query metrics, manage dashboards, analyze APM traces, and control monitors via Datadog APIs.
      30
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to interact with DataDog's observability platform through a standardized interface. Supports monitoring infrastructure, managing events, analyzing logs and metrics, and automating operations like alerts and downtimes.
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      C
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables interaction with Datadog APIs through automatically generated tools from Postman collections. Supports monitoring operations, log management, metrics submission, and other Datadog functionality through natural language.
      100
      16 npm
      Apache 2.0
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A Model Context Protocol (MCP) server that provides comprehensive Datadog monitoring capabilities, enabling Claude to manage CI/CD pipelines, analyze logs, query metrics, and handle monitors and SLOs.
      -

    TDQS

    B3.3/5.0

    Scored across 13 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Most tools have distinct purposes targeting specific Datadog resources like dashboards, incidents, monitors, RUM, metrics, and spans. However, there is some potential overlap between 'get_rum_events' and 'get_rum_grouped_event_count' as both involve retrieving RUM events, though the latter adds grouping and counting functionality. Overall, the descriptions help clarify differences, but a few tools could be slightly confusing without careful reading.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    The naming is highly consistent, following a clear verb_noun pattern throughout. All tools use either 'get_' or 'list_' prefixes followed by a specific resource name, with no deviations in style or convention. This predictability makes it easy for agents to understand and select tools based on their intended actions.

    Tool Count5/5

    With 13 tools, the count is well-scoped for a Datadog monitoring and observability server. It covers key areas like dashboards, incidents, monitors, RUM, metrics, and spans without being overwhelming. Each tool appears to serve a distinct purpose, contributing to a comprehensive toolset that aligns with the server's domain.

    Completeness4/5

    The toolset provides strong read-only coverage for Datadog's core features, including retrieval and listing of dashboards, incidents, monitors, RUM data, metrics, and spans. However, there are notable gaps in write operations (e.g., no create, update, or delete tools) and limited query capabilities beyond basic metrics and RUM events. Agents can work around this for read-heavy tasks, but full lifecycle management is not supported.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues