list_uploads

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description must disclose behavior. It states the tool lists uploads but does not explicitly confirm it is read-only, non-destructive, or describe any side effects, permissions, or rate limits. The description relies on the agent assuming a list operation is safe, which is not explicit.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, front-loaded sentence that immediately communicates the core purpose. Every word earns its place, with no redundancy or filler.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool has no parameters and an output schema (presumably documenting return values), the description is minimally adequate. However, it lacks usage context among siblings and does not explain behavioral aspects like pagination or ordering. More detail would improve completeness for an agent navigating multiple list tools.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema has zero parameters, and schema coverage is 100%. According to guidelines, 0 parameters yields a baseline of 4. The description does not need to add parameter information and does not detract from clarity.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool lists all uploads and clarifies that uploads are extract+load jobs. It specifies the scope ('in the organization') and the verb 'list', making the purpose unambiguous. Although no sibling tool also lists uploads, the description differentiates from other list tools by defining the resource type.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives like list_transformations or list_catalog. There is no mention of prerequisites, use cases, or exclusions. The agent is left to infer context from the tool name alone.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.