list_tables
List all tables in a MaxCompute project.
Instructions
List all tables in the MaxCompute project
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
List all tables in a MaxCompute project.
List all tables in the MaxCompute project
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations provided, and description offers no behavioral details such as permissions, performance impact, or whether it returns metadata. It only states the basic action.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Single sentence, concise and direct. No extraneous information.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
For a simple listing tool with no parameters, the description is adequate. It could be improved by hinting at the output (e.g., list of table names).
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
No parameters, so schema coverage is 100% by default. Description does not need to add parameter details, but it could still mention that no arguments are needed.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
Description clearly states the action ('list') and resource ('all tables in the MaxCompute project'). It distinguishes from sibling tools such as describe_table, get_latest_partition, and read_query.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives. It does not specify prerequisites or context.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/datafe/maxcompute-mcp-server'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server