Cyb MCP Server
Related Servers
Alternatives to Cyb MCP Server
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceAn MCP server that powers AI agents with indexed blockchain data from The Graph.3MIT
- FlicenseBqualityDmaintenanceMCP server enabling AI agents to participate in the Wisdom Network. Provides tools for knowledge management, trust relationships, and content transformation.41-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceAn MCP server that gives AI agents real-time access to DeFi across multiple chains, enabling non-custodial crypto trading, portfolio queries, and transaction execution.07MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceA universal MCP server providing persistent, structured memory through a knowledge graph with graph storage, semantic vector search, and multi-hop traversal for AI agents and IDEs.1MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceMCP server that gives AI agents and teams persistent, shared memory using a knowledge graph with vector embeddings, automatic consolidation of related facts, and hybrid search.3-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceMCP server that gives AI agents a continual learning brain with lessons, skills, memories, evidence-based refinement, rollback, and hybrid GraphRAG retrieval.MIT
TDQS
Scored across 3 tools
Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose: getCyberlink retrieves content from IPFS, searchQuery searches the knowledge graph and optionally retrieves content, and sendCyberlink creates links between CIDs. There is no overlap in functionality, making tool selection straightforward for an agent.
The tools follow a consistent verb_noun pattern (getCyberlink, searchQuery, sendCyberlink) with camelCase naming throughout. However, 'searchQuery' uses 'Query' as the noun, which is slightly less descriptive than the others, but overall the naming is highly consistent and predictable.
With 3 tools, this server is well-scoped for its purpose of interacting with the Cyber network and IPFS. Each tool serves a distinct and essential function (retrieval, search, and linking), and there are no extraneous tools, making the count appropriate and efficient.
The toolset covers core operations for the Cyber/IPFS domain: retrieving content, searching the knowledge graph, and creating cyberlinks. Minor gaps might include operations like deleting or updating cyberlinks, but the provided tools enable key workflows without significant dead ends.