fossa_get_release_group

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description adds value beyond the readOnlyHint and openWorldHint annotations by explaining the meaning of release_group_id (the integer in the FOSSA URL) and defining the three sections and the default behavior. It is consistent with the annotations and provides useful behavioral context.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is compact, front-loaded with the main purpose, and then covers parameter details and defaults in a structured way. Every sentence contributes meaningful information, with no unnecessary repetition.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a read-only retrieval tool with an output schema, this description is complete: it covers the resource, optional selections, parameter semantics, and default behavior. The presence of an output schema means it doesn't need to describe return values in detail.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Both parameters are explained in the description: release_group_id is the integer in the release group's FOSSA URL, and sections enumerates the possible values with their meanings. Since the schema has no descriptions, this fully compensates and gives the agent clear guidance.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states 'Get a FOSSA release group by its numeric id' and specifies that it can optionally include teams and projects. This distinguishes it from sibling tools like fossa_get_release_group_release or fossa_list_release_group_releases because it focuses on fetching the group record itself.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides clear context for what the tool returns and explains the optional sections ('group', 'teams', 'projects'). However, it does not explicitly mention when not to use this tool or point to alternative tools, such as fossa_get_release_group_release when only a single release is needed.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.