set_channel_eq

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations provided. Description only states it sets EQ parameters, implying mutation, but does not disclose side effects, error conditions, or return value details.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Single sentence, front-loaded with verb and resource. Efficient but could include brief parameter details without losing conciseness.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Despite complexity (5 parameters, no annotations, no output schema explanation), description only covers basic purpose. Lacks parameter semantics, behavioral notes, and usage context, leaving significant gaps for agent.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Input schema has 5 parameters with 0% description coverage. Description adds only that band is 1-4 and it's for a channel; no explanation of frequency_hz, gain_db, or Q meaning, units, or valid ranges.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Description clearly states the action 'Set' on resource 'EQ parameters for a channel band (1-4)', which is specific and distinguishes from sibling tools like set_channel_eq_on.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No explicit guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives. The purpose is implied but lacks context on prerequisites or when not to use.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.