A
licenseA
qualityB
maintenanceEnables code-review gating by converting a git diff into a typed verdict with safety probabilities, severity, and recommended actions for auto-merge or human review.
1
1
MIT
PR Viewer MCP Server
Related Servers
Alternatives to PR Viewer MCP Server
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceA local, read-only Git change review tool that provides total workspace diffs, staged/unstaged views, file-level inspection, and task-scoped snapshots for MCP-compatible clients like Codex, Claude Code, and Cursor.MIT
Selvageofficial
AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables AI-powered code review of Git diffs through natural language, supporting multiple AI models and Git workflows.29 PyPI36Apache 2.0- FlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceRuns a multi-agent code review pipeline via MCP, analyzing git diffs for security, quality, and logic issues and returning a pass/fail verdict.-
- FlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceEnables fetching Pull Request diffs from GitHub and posting inline review comments directly on PRs, either as pending drafts or published immediately.2-
- AlicenseBqualityDmaintenanceEnables AI assistants to perform code reviews by providing access to staged files, git diffs, and repository file content. It allows users to evaluate changes and context within any local git repository before committing or pushing.39 npmISC
TDQS
A3.6/5.0
Scored across 2 tools
Disambiguation5/5
The two tools have completely distinct purposes: one checks server health, the other initiates a review workflow. There is no overlap or ambiguity.
Naming Consistency4/5
Both names use snake_case, but 'health_check' is a noun phrase while 'open_review' is a verb phrase, creating a minor inconsistency in grammatical pattern.
Tool Count2/5
Only two tools for a 'PR Viewer' server is very thin. The scope appears limited, and typical MCP servers offer more operations for meaningful interaction.
Completeness1/5
The server lacks essential tools for a PR viewer, such as listing PRs, viewing details, or commenting. Only a health check and a single review tool are provided, leaving major gaps.
Maintenance
ActivityInactive
ResponsivenessNo issues