rew_load_file_execute

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Discloses a confirmation requirement, which is a behavioral trait. With no annotations, the description carries the burden of explaining side effects, but it only says 'after explicit confirmation' without detailing what happens on load (e.g., overwriting current state, auth requirements). It adds minimal context beyond the schema fields.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

A single, front-loaded sentence with no fluff. However, essential detail is missing, which is penalized in other dimensions; the brevity itself is appropriate.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given three parameters (including a nested plan object) and no output schema, the description is far too sparse. It fails to explain what the plan is, what 'exact hashed MDAT' means, or how the confirmation token is used, leaving an agent unable to invoke the tool correctly.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0%, so the description must compensate. It only alludes to 'explicit confirmation' without explaining the confirmationToken format or purpose, and the 'plan' object is completely unexplained. No meaningful parameter semantics beyond a vague reference.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states a specific action (load) and resource (exact hashed MDAT) with a condition (after explicit confirmation). It distinguishes from siblings like rew_load_file by the 'exact hashed' and 'confirmation' aspects, though it does not explicitly name alternatives.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool versus other load tools (e.g., rew_load_file, rew_load_file_plan). It mentions 'after explicit confirmation' but does not explain prerequisites or selecting this tool over alternatives.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.