get_entrypoint

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries the full behavioral burden, yet it discloses nothing beyond the bare operation. It does not state that a session must be loaded, whether the value is cached, or how it behaves when no session exists. An output schema exists, so return formatting is partially excused.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

A single short sentence is appropriately front-loaded, but it is under-specified rather than truly concise: '(ie)' adds no information and the sentence omits essentials for a 1-parameter tool.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple read-only getter with a defined output schema, the description borders on sufficient, but with no annotations and an undocumented session_id it leaves the agent guessing about session requirements and the relationship to sibling metadata tools.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0% and the single session_id parameter is undocumented in both schema and description. The description does not explain what session_id selects or what happens when it is omitted (it is optional with a null default).

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States a specific verb and resource: 'Get binary entrypoint'. An agent can tell it retrieves the entrypoint address of the loaded binary. It does not, however, distinguish itself from neighbors like get_binary_info, which likely also exposes the entrypoint, and the '(ie)' abbreviation is cryptic.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to call this versus get_binary_info, get_sections, or other metadata tools. No mention of prerequisites such as an active session, despite session_id being present in the schema.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.