create_page

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description should disclose behavioral traits. It reveals that the page defaults to DRAFT for preview, which is helpful, but omits details like side effects, auth needs, or return behavior. The single behavioral fact raises it above minimal.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is two sentences and front-loaded with the core purpose. It is efficient but could include more parameter guidance without sacrificing conciseness.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given 5 parameters (3 required) and no output schema, the description is too sparse. It lacks context on parameter formats, prerequisites, post-creation behavior, and differentiation from sibling tools, making it incomplete for effective use.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is low (20% with only content described). The description adds no parameter meaning beyond stating the default status (already visible in enum). It fails to compensate for the undocumented parameters like site and slug.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states 'Create a new page,' which is a specific verb and resource. It distinguishes from siblings like get_page, list_pages, and update_page. The default draft behavior adds clarity.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description indicates when to use (to create a page) but does not provide explicit guidance on when not to use or mention alternatives like update_page. No prerequisites are stated, though the required parameters are implied by the schema.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.