Skip to main content
Glama
dantalan

baatjie-mcp-server

by dantalan

Related Servers

Alternatives to baatjie-mcp-server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A governed MCP server exposing 37 risk-checked tools with signed Ed25519 receipts on a Bitcoin-anchored ledger, failing closed if governance or receipt writing fails.
      -
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      A governed MCP server with OAuth 2.1 + PKCE, declarative tool scoping, row-level data filters, per-identity rate limits, and a tamper-evident audit trail.
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Provides a sovereign, MIT-licensed MCP server for professional-service workflows, running entirely on your infrastructure with Ed25519 cryptographic signing for every action.
      MIT
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      An MCP server exposing narrowly scoped storage workflows with Overseer approval integration and redacted execution evidence, currently in fixture-only development for testing via stdio.
      -

    TDQS

    A4.4/5.0

    Scored across 16 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Tools are mostly distinct: generic CRUD (query/insert/update/delete) is clearly separated from specialized reads like dashboard, pipeline, arrears, and signal_queue. A few overlaps exist (e.g., baatjie_query could be used for many read needs), but descriptions guide to the specialized tools, so confusion is minimal.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    All tools share the 'baatjie_' prefix and mostly use snake_case with verb_noun patterns (schedule_signal, list_todos, create_todo, update_todo, log_activity). However, some are noun-only (dashboard, pipeline, arrears, signal_queue, brand_snapshot), which is a minor deviation from the otherwise consistent pattern.

    Tool Count4/5

    With 16 tools, the server sits just above the ideal 3-15 range but feels justified given the two subsystems (tanOS and sigscheCore) and the combination of generic CRUD plus domain-specific reads/actions. The count is manageable and not bloated.

    Completeness4/5

    Generic CRUD tools (query/insert/update/delete) cover virtually all tables, while specialized tools like baatjie_next_actions, baatjie_pipeline, baatjie_arrears, and baatjie_signal_queue provide high-level views. Minor gaps like a specific cancel_signal or update_signal are covered by the generic update/delete, so there are no critical dead ends.

    Maintenance

    ActivitySlowing
    ResponsivenessNo issues