@dannyvan/zentao-mcp
Related Servers
Alternatives to @dannyvan/zentao-mcp
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseDqualityCmaintenanceEnables interaction with ZenTao open-source instances to query and manage tasks, bugs, stories, test cases, and test runs, using REST v1 with legacy fallback for incompatible routes.5215 npmMIT
- FlicenseBqualityCmaintenanceEnables interaction with ZenTao project management system through RESTful API v1. Supports bug tracking, project/product management, and automated token authentication for seamless integration.1011 npm1-
- FlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceEnables interaction with ZenTao project management system through RESTful APIs. Supports listing products, managing bugs, viewing statistics, and filtering personal bug assignments through natural language.436 npm15-
- AlicenseBqualityCmaintenanceEnables interaction with ZenTao project management software through its REST API. Supports bug tracking, product management, and issue resolution with secure authentication for streamlined development workflows.712 npm1ISC
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityFmaintenanceEnables AI assistants to manage Zentao bugs, requirements, and test cases through natural language interactions. It supports querying, creating, and updating various Zentao data entities including products, projects, and executions.10 npm11-
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceExposes Zentao REST API as MCP tools for listing/searching bugs, reading details with screenshots, and resolving bugs after explicit confirmation. Includes a setup wizard to configure Codex, Claude, Cursor and other clients.-
TDQS
Scored across 9 tools
Each tool targets a distinct action on the Bug resource: read, search, lifecycle transitions, confirmation, and assignment. The lifecycle verbs (resolve, close, activate, confirm, assign) are clearly separate state changes, and the descriptions clarify any subtle overlap.
All tools follow a consistent zentao_<verb>_bug pattern, with plural bug only where list/search return collections. The naming is predictable and makes the action for each tool immediately obvious.
Nine tools is a well-scoped size for a bug-management server. Each tool covers a meaningful operation, and the count is neither bloated nor too thin.
The toolset covers querying and state transitions well, but there is no create_bug tool and no generic update tool for fields like title, severity, or priority. The comment_bug tool is also explicitly non-functional, so agents cannot fully manage bugs through this server alone.