Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to Memory MCP

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      An MCP server that stores project memory in Supabase, allowing AI tools to persist context, notes, and decisions across sessions. Enables Claude Code, Codex, and similar assistants to maintain long-term project continuity through persistent memory storage.
      2
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Persistent memory for AI coding agents, storing decisions, bug fixes, conventions, and discoveries in a local SQLite database and automatically recalling them when relevant. Works with Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, Gemini CLI, and other MCP-compatible agents.
      22
      2
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Persistent memory for AI coding agents. Enables agents to save and recall decisions, patterns, bugs, and context across sessions via an MCP server with local SQLite storage.
      4 npm
      2
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables AI coding agents to maintain persistent, cross-session memory of codebase architecture, naming conventions, and decisions through MCP tools. Eliminates repetitive project re-explanation by automatically injecting stored context into every session with local-first SQLite storage and optional team sharing capabilities.
      4
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Persistent cloud memory for AI coding assistants. 28 MCP tools for semantic search, auto-learning, task tracking, correction patterns, knowledge graphs, and session replay across Claude Code, Cursor, Windsurf, Cline, and any MCP client. Encrypted at rest. Team shared memory with author attribution.
      35
      415 npm
      7
      MIT

    TDQS

    C2.6/5.0

    Scored across 22 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Most tools are clearly distinct, but 'resolve_project' and 'create_project' have overlapping functionality (resolve auto-creates), and several save tools (capture_project_memory, save_file_memory, etc.) could be confused without reading descriptions.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tool names follow a consistent verb_noun pattern with underscores, using clear Spanish verbs and nouns. No mixing of conventions or unclear abbreviations.

    Tool Count4/5

    22 tools is on the high end of the acceptable range. Each tool has a defined purpose, but the count feels slightly heavy for a memory management system. Could be streamlined by merging some similar save functions.

    Completeness4/5

    Covers core operations: create/list/resume projects, session management, memory storage, search, import/export, and warnings. Minor gaps: no explicit delete or update tools for projects or memory items, but the existing tools cover most workflows.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessWithin a week