Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to hidim

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables LLM clients to load, clean, visualize, and analyze tabular datasets, and to generate multi-format analytic reports through natural language instructions.
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables creating interactive data visualizations from natural language queries using DuckDB for local databases or Databricks for enterprise data warehouses. Supports multiple chart types, CSV imports, SQL queries, and automatic statistical analysis through Claude Desktop.
      19
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables Claude to perform exact math, date and holiday calculations, CSV/SQLite/PDF and text processing, filesystem and system diagnostics, network requests, and ffmpeg-based media operations through small purpose-built tools.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables read-only analytical access to local CSV, Parquet, JSON files or a DuckDB database through MCP, with table discovery, column profiling, guarded SQL querying, and explain plans for safe use with Claude Desktop and Claude Code.
      8
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables MCP clients like Claude Desktop, Claude Code and Cursor to safely explore local CSV, Excel, Parquet and SQLite files by running guarded read-only DuckDB SQL over a sandboxed data directory. It also supports data profiling, chart generation as image content, and exporting query results, without ever allowing writes or access outside the configured folder.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables Claude Code to interact with Jupyter notebooks, perform semantic search over knowledge files, and manage research projects.
      33
      4
      MIT

    TDQS

    A3.5/5.0

    Scored across 20 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Most tools have clearly distinct roles, and the table-versus-tensor split is consistently reflected in names and descriptions. The few overlaps are paired conversions (tensorize vs tensor_from_wide, tensor_to_table vs slice_tensor) where the descriptions help but an agent may still pause to choose.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Names are consistently snake_case and generally action-oriented, with predictable prefixes for tensor operations. There are minor deviations: some tools are bare verbs (plot, describe, transform, subset, cluster) while others are noun-like (loadings, neighbors), but the set remains highly readable.

    Tool Count4/5

    Twenty tools is on the heavy side for a single server, but the scope is broad: loading/saving, profiling, plotting, preprocessing, dimensionality reduction, clustering, and tensor operations. Each tool earns its place, though the surface could be slightly tightened.

    Completeness4/5

    The lifecycle is well covered for datasets: create/load, inspect, transform, subset, save, and drop. Notable gaps remain for common table workflows such as joins/merges and explicit group-by aggregation, though some workarounds exist through tensorize and subset.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo recent community issues