Skip to main content
Glama
daniloneto

Bitbucket MCP

by daniloneto
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
JavaScript
Remote

Related Servers

Alternatives to Bitbucket MCP

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • bitbucket-mcp

      matt-nann
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      MCP server for Bitbucket Cloud that enables reviewing, managing, and merging pull requests, assigning reviewers by name, reading files at a ref, and inspecting pipeline status from any MCP client.
      14
      MIT

    • Bitbucket MCP Server

      nbhson
      A
      license
      B
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      MCP server for Bitbucket Server integration, enabling project, repository, pull request, source code, branch, and code review operations via the Bitbucket Server APIs.
      27
      17 npm
      MIT

    • Bitbucket MCP Server

      ATERCATES
      A
      license
      C
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      MCP server for integrating with Bitbucket Cloud and Server APIs, enabling AI assistants to interact with repositories, pull requests, pipelines, and more.
      59
      28 npm
      3
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A3.7/5.0

    Scored across 11 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose: listing repos, PRs, directory/file reading, PR metadata retrieval (diff, comments, commits), and PR write actions (comment, approve, request changes). No overlap in functionality.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tools follow a consistent verb_noun snake_case pattern (e.g., get_pull_request, add_pull_request_comment, list_repositories). No mixing of styles or vague verbs.

    Tool Count5/5

    11 tools is well-scoped for a Bitbucket integration, covering essential read and write operations for repositories and pull request review workflows without being excessive.

    Completeness4/5

    Covers core PR review actions (get, comment, approve, request changes) plus file/directory exploration. Minor gaps like merge/decline PR or update/delete comments, but sufficient for typical agent use.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources