Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to atlasbrain

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables AI coding agents to retrieve focused structural context from a local code graph, inspect relationships, and carry project memory across sessions. It serves this context via MCP to reduce token usage while investigating code before making behavioral claims.
      35 npm
      MIT
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to query a local, hybrid-searchable second brain over scattered notes, documents, and chat logs with section-level citations. It exposes retrieval tools, resources, and prompts through MCP so hosts like Claude Desktop, Cursor, and Cline can use the indexed knowledge.
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      This MCP server exposes a local structural code graph and project memory so AI coding agents can retrieve focused code entities, relationships, and prior mistakes before reading full files. It enables bounded context queries, caller/callee and impact analysis, and carryover of recorded session information through a CLI, hooks, and an authenticated local dashboard.
      35 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      C
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Local-first MCP server that turns project documentation and source code into durable, evidence-backed context for AI agents, with bounded retrieval and explicit gap reporting.
      8
      256 npm
      Apache 2.0

    TDQS

    B3.4/5.0

    Scored across 23 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    The descriptions are unusually detailed and explicitly cross-reference each other (e.g. atualizar_nota pointing to registrar_decisao when a decision changes; buscar pointing to ler/ler_varios), which strongly guides selection. There is still real overlap in the graph camp (consultar_grafo, caminho, impacto, onde, explicar, relacionados) and between atualizar_nota/anexar, but each tool has a defensible distinct purpose.

    Naming Consistency3/5

    All names are lowercase snake_case and Portuguese-consistent, but the grammatical pattern is mixed: bare verbs (ler, buscar, anexar), nouns (mapa, tags, impacto, relatorio), adjectives (relacionados, recentes), an adverb (onde), and verb_noun (criar_nota, registrar_decisao, importar_url). It is readable but does not follow a single predictable convention.

    Tool Count3/5

    23 tools sits in the heavy range for what is essentially a personal knowledge/notes-and-code brain. The domain is broad enough to justify many tools, but several (onde/explicar, consultar_grafo/caminho, atualizar_nota/anexar) could plausibly be consolidated.

    Completeness4/5

    Coverage is strong across reading, searching, graph/reference analysis, note creation, decisions, learnings, URL import, and reindexing, giving a fairly complete lifecycle. Minor gaps exist (no delete/move/rename and no true content-edit for notes, only append/atualizar), but agents can work around these.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues