atlasbrain
Related Servers
Alternatives to atlasbrain
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceEnables AI coding agents to retrieve focused structural context from a local code graph, inspect relationships, and carry project memory across sessions. It serves this context via MCP to reduce token usage while investigating code before making behavioral claims.35 npmMIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceA local-first MCP server that lets AI assistants search and retrieve context from indexed projects, Git state, decisions, and tasks without sending data to the cloud.MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceEnables AI agents to query a local, hybrid-searchable second brain over scattered notes, documents, and chat logs with section-level citations. It exposes retrieval tools, resources, and prompts through MCP so hosts like Claude Desktop, Cursor, and Cline can use the indexed knowledge.-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceThis MCP server exposes a local structural code graph and project memory so AI coding agents can retrieve focused code entities, relationships, and prior mistakes before reading full files. It enables bounded context queries, caller/callee and impact analysis, and carryover of recorded session information through a CLI, hooks, and an authenticated local dashboard.35 npmMIT
- AlicenseCqualityAmaintenanceLocal-first MCP server that turns project documentation and source code into durable, evidence-backed context for AI agents, with bounded retrieval and explicit gap reporting.8256 npmApache 2.0
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables AI agents to locally search, query, and understand codebases with token-efficient context, dependency graphs, history, architecture diagrams, and metrics through MCP.15 npm3MIT
TDQS
Scored across 23 tools
The descriptions are unusually detailed and explicitly cross-reference each other (e.g. atualizar_nota pointing to registrar_decisao when a decision changes; buscar pointing to ler/ler_varios), which strongly guides selection. There is still real overlap in the graph camp (consultar_grafo, caminho, impacto, onde, explicar, relacionados) and between atualizar_nota/anexar, but each tool has a defensible distinct purpose.
All names are lowercase snake_case and Portuguese-consistent, but the grammatical pattern is mixed: bare verbs (ler, buscar, anexar), nouns (mapa, tags, impacto, relatorio), adjectives (relacionados, recentes), an adverb (onde), and verb_noun (criar_nota, registrar_decisao, importar_url). It is readable but does not follow a single predictable convention.
23 tools sits in the heavy range for what is essentially a personal knowledge/notes-and-code brain. The domain is broad enough to justify many tools, but several (onde/explicar, consultar_grafo/caminho, atualizar_nota/anexar) could plausibly be consolidated.
Coverage is strong across reading, searching, graph/reference analysis, note creation, decisions, learnings, URL import, and reindexing, giving a fairly complete lifecycle. Minor gaps exist (no delete/move/rename and no true content-edit for notes, only append/atualizar), but agents can work around these.