Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to atlasbrain

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      C
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Local-first MCP server that turns project documentation and source code into durable, evidence-backed context for AI agents, with bounded retrieval and explicit gap reporting.
      8
      1,003 npm
      Apache 2.0
    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      A local-first MCP server that provides AI agents with safe codebase access through file discovery, hybrid lexical-semantic search, and project introspection. It features durable local memory and semantic indexing while keeping all data and processing entirely on your local machine.
      74
      34 npm
      6
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Turns any folder of PDFs, markdown, and text files into a local, queryable knowledge base exposed as an MCP server. Enables MCP-compatible agents to semantically search indexed documents, retrieve relevant passages with source and relevance scores, list or reindex documents, and inspect cache and token usage — instead of reading whole files into context.
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Local MCP server to index your codebase once and search it across AI sessions with keyword, semantic, or hybrid search, keeping all data on disk.
      90 npm
      4
      MIT

    TDQS

    B3.4/5.0

    Scored across 23 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    The descriptions are unusually detailed and explicitly cross-reference each other (e.g. atualizar_nota pointing to registrar_decisao when a decision changes; buscar pointing to ler/ler_varios), which strongly guides selection. There is still real overlap in the graph camp (consultar_grafo, caminho, impacto, onde, explicar, relacionados) and between atualizar_nota/anexar, but each tool has a defensible distinct purpose.

    Naming Consistency3/5

    All names are lowercase snake_case and Portuguese-consistent, but the grammatical pattern is mixed: bare verbs (ler, buscar, anexar), nouns (mapa, tags, impacto, relatorio), adjectives (relacionados, recentes), an adverb (onde), and verb_noun (criar_nota, registrar_decisao, importar_url). It is readable but does not follow a single predictable convention.

    Tool Count3/5

    23 tools sits in the heavy range for what is essentially a personal knowledge/notes-and-code brain. The domain is broad enough to justify many tools, but several (onde/explicar, consultar_grafo/caminho, atualizar_nota/anexar) could plausibly be consolidated.

    Completeness4/5

    Coverage is strong across reading, searching, graph/reference analysis, note creation, decisions, learnings, URL import, and reindexing, giving a fairly complete lifecycle. Minor gaps exist (no delete/move/rename and no true content-edit for notes, only append/atualizar), but agents can work around these.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues