Lighthouse MCP
Related Servers
Alternatives to Lighthouse MCP
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceMCP server for website QA auditing, covering SEO, performance, security, accessibility, and agent experience with 260+ rules and AI-optimized output for coding agents.267MIT- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceA comprehensive MCP server providing 15 web tools including search, scraping, screenshots, SEO audits, and DNS/SSL checks through a single installation. It delivers clean, LLM-optimized outputs so AI agents can focus on reasoning rather than parsing raw HTML.156 npmMIT
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceMCP server exposing SuperAudit’s free website audit as a callable tool, enabling AI agents to audit any public URL and receive scores across SEO, security, legal, performance, and more. No API key required; respects rate limits and caches results.1MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceA comprehensive MCP server for SEO, performance, GEO, and UX audits with 37 tools covering technical SEO, Lighthouse performance, AI search optimization, content analysis, accessibility, security, and more.1MIT
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceEnables AI agents to perform comprehensive SEO audits on web pages, including meta tags, headings, links, images, performance, and more, via a CLI or MCP server.1817 PyPI1MIT
- FlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceAn MCP server that audits websites for accessibility (WCAG 2.1 AA/EAA), performance, SEO, design quality, and mobile responsiveness, providing actionable scores, grades, and prioritized fixes.6-
TDQS
Scored across 11 tools
There is significant overlap between run_audit and the specific getter tools (accessibility, SEO, performance), as run_audit likely encompasses all of those. Additionally, get_lcp_opportunities, find_unused_javascript, and analyze_resources all target performance optimization with unclear boundaries.
Most tools follow a clear verb_noun pattern (e.g., get_*, run_audit, compare_mobile_desktop, check_performance_budget). Minor deviations include run_audit vs. get_security_audit (both use 'audit' but different verbs) and find_unused_javascript/analyze_resources not using 'get_' prefix, but the overall convention is consistent.
With 11 tools, the set is well-scoped for a website auditing server. Each tool covers a distinct aspect of Lighthouse auditing (performance, SEO, accessibility, security, resources), and the count is within the ideal 3-15 range without feeling bloated.
The tool surface covers major Lighthouse categories (performance, accessibility, SEO, security, Core Web Vitals, resources) and includes useful extras like budget checks and mobile/desktop comparison. However, it lacks explicit best practices and PWA audits, which are standard Lighthouse categories, creating minor gaps.