Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to Lighthouse MCP

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A comprehensive MCP server providing 15 web tools including search, scraping, screenshots, SEO audits, and DNS/SSL checks through a single installation. It delivers clean, LLM-optimized outputs so AI agents can focus on reasoning rather than parsing raw HTML.
      15
      6 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      MCP server exposing SuperAudit’s free website audit as a callable tool, enabling AI agents to audit any public URL and receive scores across SEO, security, legal, performance, and more. No API key required; respects rate limits and caches results.
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A comprehensive MCP server for SEO, performance, GEO, and UX audits with 37 tools covering technical SEO, Lighthouse performance, AI search optimization, content analysis, accessibility, security, and more.
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to perform comprehensive SEO audits on web pages, including meta tags, headings, links, images, performance, and more, via a CLI or MCP server.
      18
      17 PyPI
      1
      MIT
    • F
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      An MCP server that audits websites for accessibility (WCAG 2.1 AA/EAA), performance, SEO, design quality, and mobile responsiveness, providing actionable scores, grades, and prioritized fixes.
      6
      -

    TDQS

    B3.3/5.0

    Scored across 11 tools

    Disambiguation2/5

    There is significant overlap between run_audit and the specific getter tools (accessibility, SEO, performance), as run_audit likely encompasses all of those. Additionally, get_lcp_opportunities, find_unused_javascript, and analyze_resources all target performance optimization with unclear boundaries.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Most tools follow a clear verb_noun pattern (e.g., get_*, run_audit, compare_mobile_desktop, check_performance_budget). Minor deviations include run_audit vs. get_security_audit (both use 'audit' but different verbs) and find_unused_javascript/analyze_resources not using 'get_' prefix, but the overall convention is consistent.

    Tool Count5/5

    With 11 tools, the set is well-scoped for a website auditing server. Each tool covers a distinct aspect of Lighthouse auditing (performance, SEO, accessibility, security, resources), and the count is within the ideal 3-15 range without feeling bloated.

    Completeness4/5

    The tool surface covers major Lighthouse categories (performance, accessibility, SEO, security, Core Web Vitals, resources) and includes useful extras like budget checks and mobile/desktop comparison. However, it lacks explicit best practices and PWA audits, which are standard Lighthouse categories, creating minor gaps.

    Maintenance

    ActivityActive
    ResponsivenessUnresponsive