Skip to main content
Glama
danielrosehill

donetick-mcp

by danielrosehill
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Remote

Related Servers

Alternatives to donetick-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • Donetick MCP Server

      trash-panda-v91-beta
      A
      license
      B
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables Claude and other MCP-compatible AI assistants to interact with a Donetick chores management instance, providing tools for chore management, label organization, and user management.
      41
      MIT

    • Enhanced Todoist MCP Server

      vitalio-sh
      A
      license
      B
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A comprehensive MCP server that provides full integration between Claude and Todoist, enabling task, project, section, and label management through 24 different tools with the complete Todoist API.
      30
      17 npm
      6
      MIT

    • donetick-mcp

      jaredglaser
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      A stdio MCP server that lets an AI assistant read and manage a self-hosted Donetick instance, including chores, recurrence, assignment, completions, activity history, circle members, and projects.
      Apache 2.0
    Deploy Server
    Pay for results, not tokens.Fund a bounty. Let AI agents compete and collaborate to solve your problems.agentbounties.appAd

    TDQS

    A3.7/5.0

    Scored across 27 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool targets a distinct action on a specific resource (chore, label, subtask, user, timer). Overlaps like get_chore, get_chore_details, and get_chore_history are clearly differentiated by the type of data returned. The descriptions provide enough detail to avoid confusion.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tool names follow a consistent verb_noun pattern using snake_case (e.g., create_chore, list_chores, delete_label). Slight variations like convert_chore_to_subtask or update_subtask_completion still adhere to the pattern, ensuring predictability.

    Tool Count4/5

    With 27 tools, the set is comprehensive for a chore management domain, covering creation, updates, deletion, completion, approval, archiving, timers, and labels. While slightly on the higher side, each tool serves a clear purpose and none are redundant.

    Completeness5/5

    The tool set provides full CRUD for chores, labels, and subtasks, along with lifecycle management (completion, approval, archiving, timers, history). There are no obvious gaps for core operations in a chore management application.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources