Skip to main content
Glama
danielrosehill

BTRFS Snapper MCP

by danielrosehill
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Local

Related Servers

Alternatives to BTRFS Snapper MCP

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • Proxmox MCP Server

      ry-ops
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables interaction with Proxmox VE for managing VMs, containers, storage, and cluster resources via natural language through the Model Context Protocol.
      19
      MIT

    • Windows Server MCP

      TechGOELogy
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables read-only observability of Windows systems, exposing CPU, memory, storage, service, and health information through Model Context Protocol tools.
      MIT

    • aha-mcp

      sergiolopezgsiot
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables natural language interaction with Home Assistant for managing entities, automations, services, and dashboards via the Model Context Protocol.
      141 npm
      MIT

    • datto-rmm-mcp

      MSPbotsAI
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables querying Datto RMM device inventory and component libraries, executing components on devices as quick jobs, and checking job status over the Model Context Protocol.
      -
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A4.3/5.0

    Scored across 2 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    The two tools have completely distinct purposes: btrfs_health monitors filesystem health, and snapper manages snapshots. There is no overlap in functionality, so an agent can easily distinguish when to use each.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Both tool names are descriptive and use a clear style (btrfs_health uses prefix 'btrfs_', snapper uses the application name). While there is no strict pattern like verb_noun, the names are intuitive and consistent in being self-explanatory.

    Tool Count2/5

    Only two tools for a complex domain like BTRFS management is minimal. Each tool bundles many sub-actions, which could be separate tools for better discoverability. The low count suggests an incomplete surface for tasks like defragmentation or advanced configuration.

    Completeness4/5

    The tools cover essential BTRFS operations: health monitoring (usage, errors, scrub, balance) and snapshot management (create, delete, rollback, diff, cleanup). Missing are direct balance initiation or defragmentation, but these are covered by status checks, making the set fairly comprehensive for core tasks.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources