Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to MCP_CAD

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables AI (e.g., Claude) to control SolidWorks via natural language, automating part creation, sketching, and feature operations through the Model Context Protocol.
      1
      MIT
    • -
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      Not graded
      maintenance
      Enables AI-powered CAD automation in Autodesk Fusion 360 through natural language prompts. Features a modern web chat interface with multiple LLM backends for creating 3D models, sketches, and parametric designs.
      -
    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      An MCP server for parametric part modeling in Onshape, producing fully-defined, variable-driven sketches and features. It enables LLMs to create editable CAD models using semantic selection and geometrically grounded constraints.
      33
      MIT
    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Connects AI coding agents to Autodesk Fusion 360 for CAD automation, enabling natural language control over sketching, 3D modeling, and CAM operations. It uses a Python-based bridge and a custom add-in to execute over 80 tools ranging from simple geometry creation to complex assembly and parameter management.
      80
      333 PyPI
      101
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      F
      maintenance
      Enables AI-powered parametric CAD design in Autodesk Fusion 360 through natural language commands. Supports multiple AI backends (Ollama, OpenAI, Gemini, Claude) with intelligent routing and safety validation for geometric operations.
      16
      MIT

    TDQS

    A3.6/5.0

    Scored across 100 tools

    Disambiguation2/5

    Many tools have overlapping purposes, e.g., multiple ways to create holes (add_bolt_circle, add_drill_pattern, hole_wizard, build_flange_boss, build_threaded_boss) and to build profiles. Descriptions help but an agent would still struggle to reliably pick the right tool.

    Naming Consistency3/5

    Tool names follow a mix of patterns (verb_noun, build_*, add_*, etc.). Some are descriptive but inconsistent (e.g., add_mate_by_face_position vs stack_components). No dominant pattern, leading to moderate confusion.

    Tool Count2/5

    With 100 tools, the server is over-scoped for a typical CAD automation use case. The recommended range is 3-15; 100 is far beyond that, making it hard for agents to navigate efficiently.

    Completeness4/5

    The tool set covers most common CAD operations: sketching, extruding, revolving, sweeping, mating, configurations, and materials. Minor gaps exist (e.g., no loft or advanced surfacing), but core autoparts workflows are well-supported.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessSyncing