MCP_CAD
Related Servers
Alternatives to MCP_CAD
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceEnables AI (e.g., Claude) to control SolidWorks via natural language, automating part creation, sketching, and feature operations through the Model Context Protocol.1MIT
- -licenseNot gradedqualityNot gradedmaintenanceEnables AI-powered CAD automation in Autodesk Fusion 360 through natural language prompts. Features a modern web chat interface with multiple LLM backends for creating 3D models, sketches, and parametric designs.-
- AlicenseBqualityDmaintenanceAn MCP server for parametric part modeling in Onshape, producing fully-defined, variable-driven sketches and features. It enables LLMs to create editable CAD models using semantic selection and geometrically grounded constraints.33MIT
- AlicenseAqualityFmaintenanceEnables natural language control of AutoCAD LT through AutoLISP code generation and execution, allowing users to create engineering drawings with conversational prompts.8523MIT
- AlicenseBqualityCmaintenanceConnects AI coding agents to Autodesk Fusion 360 for CAD automation, enabling natural language control over sketching, 3D modeling, and CAM operations. It uses a Python-based bridge and a custom add-in to execute over 80 tools ranging from simple geometry creation to complex assembly and parameter management.80333 PyPI101MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityFmaintenanceEnables AI-powered parametric CAD design in Autodesk Fusion 360 through natural language commands. Supports multiple AI backends (Ollama, OpenAI, Gemini, Claude) with intelligent routing and safety validation for geometric operations.16MIT
TDQS
Scored across 100 tools
Many tools have overlapping purposes, e.g., multiple ways to create holes (add_bolt_circle, add_drill_pattern, hole_wizard, build_flange_boss, build_threaded_boss) and to build profiles. Descriptions help but an agent would still struggle to reliably pick the right tool.
Tool names follow a mix of patterns (verb_noun, build_*, add_*, etc.). Some are descriptive but inconsistent (e.g., add_mate_by_face_position vs stack_components). No dominant pattern, leading to moderate confusion.
With 100 tools, the server is over-scoped for a typical CAD automation use case. The recommended range is 3-15; 100 is far beyond that, making it hard for agents to navigate efficiently.
The tool set covers most common CAD operations: sketching, extruding, revolving, sweeping, mating, configurations, and materials. Minor gaps exist (e.g., no loft or advanced surfacing), but core autoparts workflows are well-supported.