Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to editor-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A Model Context Protocol (MCP) server that provides line-oriented text file editing capabilities through a standardized API. Optimized for LLM tools with efficient partial file access to minimize token usage.
      MIT
    • F
      license
      B
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A lightweight MCP server for basic file operations, enabling reading, writing, and listing files securely via the Model Context Protocol.
      3
      1
      -
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      MCP server providing AI-powered file operations including read, write, edit, search, and file management via Model Context Protocol. Also includes a Flask web app with file manager and user admin.
      -
    • F
      license
      B
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      An MCP server for creating, loading, and editing RFC TXT documents using the rfc-editor Python library. It provides a suite of tools to manage document components including sections, abstracts, titles, and author metadata.
      29
      -
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      An MCP server that provides tools for secure file management within a dedicated workspace directory. It enables users to create, list, and delete files through natural language while preventing path traversal attacks.
      6 npm
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      A FastMCP server providing powerful code editing tools including precise file modifications with diff-based operations, file creation and reading with line numbers, and more tools for code editing workflows.
      MIT

    TDQS

    C2.8/5.0

    Scored across 14 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Most tools have distinct purposes, but 'cancel' and 'confirm' are ambiguous without context, and 'find_function' and 'find_line' could be confused as both search within files. The core editing tools like 'read', 'select', and 'overwrite' are clearly differentiated, supporting a coherent workflow.

    Naming Consistency3/5

    The naming is mixed with some consistency: verbs like 'find', 'set', and 'run' are used, but patterns vary (e.g., 'listdir' vs. 'new_file', 'overwrite' vs. 'select'). There's no uniform verb_noun structure, making it readable but not predictable across all tools.

    Tool Count5/5

    With 14 tools, this is well-scoped for an editor server, covering file operations, editing, searching, and testing. Each tool serves a specific role in the workflow, and the count is neither too sparse nor overwhelming for the domain.

    Completeness4/5

    The toolset provides strong coverage for file editing and testing workflows, including create, read, update, and delete operations. Minor gaps exist, such as no explicit 'save' or 'undo' tools, but agents can work around these using existing tools like 'overwrite' and workflow steps.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues