Skip to main content
Glama
danieliser

FluentBoards MCP Server

by danieliser
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
TypeScript
Remote

Related Servers

Alternatives to FluentBoards MCP Server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • WordPress MCP Server

      pravin157
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to manage WordPress posts, pages, media, taxonomies, comments, users, settings, and custom fields through the WordPress REST API. Supports secure authentication, OAuth deployment, search, and safe write controls.
      MIT

    • WordPress MCP Server

      gaupoit
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to manage WordPress sites through natural conversation, supporting post creation, content updates, site queries, and draft-to-publish workflows via the WordPress REST API.
      9
      MIT

    • Trello MCP Server

      zeno-blade-creator
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants like Claude to interact with Trello boards through natural language, supporting board operations including card management, list manipulation, attachments, labels, comments, checklists, and daily workflow automation.
      -
    Deploy Server
    Pay for results, not tokens.Fund a bounty. Let AI agents compete and collaborate to solve your problems.agentbounties.appAd

    TDQS

    B3.4/5.0

    Scored across 15 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Every tool has a clearly distinct purpose with no ambiguity. Tools target specific resources (tasks, labels, stages, boards) and actions (create, get, update, delete, add, remove, change), making it easy for an agent to select the correct tool. For example, 'add_label' vs 'create_label' vs 'remove_label' are clearly differentiated by whether they operate on tasks or boards.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    The naming follows a consistent verb_noun pattern throughout with one minor deviation. Most tools use clear action words followed by the resource (e.g., create_task, get_board, update_task). The only inconsistency is 'debug_test', which doesn't follow the domain-specific pattern but is clearly a utility tool.

    Tool Count5/5

    With 15 tools, this is well-scoped for a project management/board system. Each tool earns its place by covering essential operations for tasks, labels, stages, and boards. The count supports comprehensive workflows without being overwhelming for the domain.

    Completeness5/5

    The tool set provides complete CRUD/lifecycle coverage for the domain. It includes creation (create_task, create_label, create_stage), retrieval (get_board, get_task, list_tasks), updates (update_task, change_task_status, edit_label, add_comment, add_label), and deletion (delete_task, delete_label, remove_label). No obvious gaps exist for core board management operations.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources