A
licenseB
qualityD
maintenanceEnables AI assistants to interact with WordPress sites through REST APIs, allowing programmatic management of posts, users, comments, categories, and tags with secure authentication.
29
48
MIT
FluentBoards MCP Server
by danieliser
Related Servers
Alternatives to FluentBoards MCP Server
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceEnables AI assistants to manage WordPress sites through natural conversation, supporting post creation, content updates, site queries, and draft-to-publish workflows via the WordPress REST API.9MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables AI assistants like Claude to interact with Trello boards through natural language, supporting board operations including card management, list manipulation, attachments, labels, comments, checklists, and daily workflow automation.-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables AI agents to manage WordPress sites through the WordPress REST API, supporting content, media, users, settings, and Elementor management with safety policies for production use.MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceEnables AI assistants to manage WordPress content (create, retrieve, update posts) via the WordPress REST API with secure authentication.7 npmMIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables AI assistants to interact with Trello boards, cards, lists, and more through a standardized interface.-
TDQS
B3.4/5.0
Scored across 15 tools
Disambiguation5/5
Every tool has a clearly distinct purpose with no ambiguity. Tools target specific resources (tasks, labels, stages, boards) and actions (create, get, update, delete, add, remove, change), making it easy for an agent to select the correct tool. For example, 'add_label' vs 'create_label' vs 'remove_label' are clearly differentiated by whether they operate on tasks or boards.
Naming Consistency4/5
The naming follows a consistent verb_noun pattern throughout with one minor deviation. Most tools use clear action words followed by the resource (e.g., create_task, get_board, update_task). The only inconsistency is 'debug_test', which doesn't follow the domain-specific pattern but is clearly a utility tool.
Tool Count5/5
With 15 tools, this is well-scoped for a project management/board system. Each tool earns its place by covering essential operations for tasks, labels, stages, and boards. The count supports comprehensive workflows without being overwhelming for the domain.
Completeness5/5
The tool set provides complete CRUD/lifecycle coverage for the domain. It includes creation (create_task, create_label, create_stage), retrieval (get_board, get_task, list_tasks), updates (update_task, change_task_status, edit_label, add_comment, add_label), and deletion (delete_task, delete_label, remove_label). No obvious gaps exist for core board management operations.
Maintenance
ActivityInactive
ResponsivenessNo issues