domain-mcp
Related Servers
Alternatives to domain-mcp
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceMCP server for checking domain name availability across 500+ TLDs using RDAP with WHOIS fallback for specific TLDs.2MIT
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceAn MCP server for domain name availability checking, WHOIS lookups, and domain suggestions — no API key required.441 npmMIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityNot gradedmaintenanceAn MCP server for domain availability checks, WHOIS lookups, and domain suggestions using RDAP and TCP port 43. It allows users to perform bulk checks and retrieve registration details across multiple TLDs without requiring an API key.41 npm-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceAn MCP server for domain management, enabling domain availability checks, bulk domain checks, and API connectivity testing through the RealtimeRegister API.5 npm1MIT
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceMCP server for DNS lookups, reverse DNS, WHOIS, and domain checks. Zero auth, zero config.532 npm3MIT
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceA Model Context Protocol (MCP) server that provides comprehensive domain name research tools, including RDAP, WHOIS, and DNS query functionality.12Apache 2.0
TDQS
Scored across 5 tools
The tools are mostly distinct: check_domain and check_domains are clearly single vs bulk variants, while domain_info is differentiated by its stated purpose (metadata for known-registered domains). However, check_domain and domain_info perform essentially the same underlying check, which could cause mild misselection; the description mitigates this but the overlap is real.
The naming follows a consistent verb_noun pattern (check_domain, check_domains, domain_info, list_supported_tlds, clear_domain_cache). Minor deviation: domain_info uses 'info' rather than a clearer verb like 'get_domain_info', breaking the otherwise clean pattern, and clear_domain_cache uses an adjective+noun rather than object-first.
Five tools is within the ideal 3-15 range and appropriate for a domain-checking server. The count feels slightly trimmed—check_domain and domain_info are near-duplicates, suggesting one could be folded into the other—but the overall scope is reasonably well served.
The server covers checking, bulk checking, metadata lookup, TLD discovery, and cache management, covering the core domain-lookup workflows well. Minor gaps exist: there is no tool for WHOIS-style detailed records beyond raw payloads, and no capability to register or manage domains (if that were in scope). For pure lookups, the surface is complete.