Skip to main content
Glama
danielefavi

Code Review MCP Server

by danielefavi

Server Configuration

Describes the environment variables required to run the server.

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
GITLAB_URLNoGitLab instance URL (default: https://gitlab.com). Required for GitLab (Self-Managed).https://gitlab.com
GITHUB_TOKENNoYour GitHub Personal Access Token. Required for GitHub functionality.
GITLAB_TOKENNoYour GitLab Personal Access Token. Required for GitLab functionality.
CODE_REVIEW_GUIDELINESNoInline custom code review guidelines text. Optional (Custom Rules).
CODE_REVIEW_GUIDELINES_FILENoPath to a file containing custom code review guidelines. Optional (Custom Rules). If set, it takes precedence over CODE_REVIEW_GUIDELINES.

Instructions

Guidance the server publishes about itself, which clients place ahead of the tool catalog so the model reads it before choosing anything.

This server publishes no instructions, or was last inspected before Glama recorded them.

Capabilities

Features and capabilities supported by this server

Protocol revision2025-11-25

CapabilityDetails
tools
{
  "listChanged": true
}
prompts
{
  "listChanged": true
}

Tools

Functions exposed to the LLM to take actions

NameDescription
gitlab_list_mrsC

List merge requests for a given GitLab project

gitlab_get_mr_detailsC

Get details of a specific merge request

gitlab_get_mr_diffC

Get the diff of a specific merge request

gitlab_read_fileC

Read the content of a file at a specific ref

gitlab_get_project_metadataC

Fetch project metadata (README and manifests)

github_list_prsC

List pull requests for a given GitHub repository

github_get_pr_detailsC

Get details of a specific pull request

github_get_pr_diffC

Get the diff of a specific pull request

github_read_fileC

Read the content of a file at a specific ref

github_get_project_metadataC

Fetch project metadata (README and manifests)

Prompts

Interactive templates invoked by user choice

NameDescription
review_merge_requestGuided code review for a GitLab Merge Request
review_pull_requestGuided code review for a GitHub Pull Request

Resources

Contextual data attached and managed by the client

NameDescription

No resources

TDQS

B3.4/5.0

Scored across 10 tools

Disambiguation4/5

The tools are clearly separated by platform (GitHub vs GitLab) and action type (list, get details, get diff, read file, get metadata), with minimal overlap. However, the 'get_project_metadata' and 'read_file' tools could potentially be confused as both involve reading project content, though their specific purposes differ slightly.

Naming Consistency5/5

All tools follow a consistent pattern of platform_prefix_verb_noun (e.g., github_get_pr_details, gitlab_list_mrs). The naming is perfectly predictable and uses snake_case uniformly throughout the entire toolset.

Tool Count5/5

With 10 tools, the server is well-scoped for code review across two major platforms. Each tool has a clear purpose and contributes to the overall functionality without being excessive or insufficient for the domain.

Completeness4/5

The toolset provides comprehensive coverage for reading and reviewing code across GitHub and GitLab, including listing, viewing details, diffs, files, and metadata. A minor gap exists in the lack of tools for creating or updating reviews/comments, which are common in code review workflows, but the core review capabilities are well-covered.

Maintenance

ActivityInactive
ResponsivenessNo issues