Skip to main content
Glama
danielcaze

Agent Router MCP

by danielcaze
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Local

Related Servers

Alternatives to Agent Router MCP

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • layajev-mcp

      ronisaguey-ux
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables agents to resolve ambiguous decisions by returning calibrated probabilities for each candidate action, along with a gate that signals whether to act on the top option or escalate, all via a cheap local or remote backend.
      5
      MIT

    • Jev Context MCP

      Smith2912
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables local, bounded routing and evidence judgments for Codex tasks, with tools for reading file context, checking outputs, and selecting registered workflows while keeping execution and review with the client.
      MIT

    • agent-fastpath

      abhishekswe
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables coding agents to offload quick judgment calls like shipping readiness, file triage, and claim verification to a fast local MCP server with calibrated confidence and safe fallbacks.
      3
      MIT

    • Jev Checkpoint

      ashishakkumar
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables an AI agent to turn an uncertain routing decision into a confidence-scored choice among explicit routes, with a thresholded recommendation to proceed, review deeper, or ask for human input, while remaining advisory-only.
      1
      MIT

    • Nanites

      ADn-001
      A
      license
      B
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables Claude Code and Claude Desktop to delegate bounded, disposable tasks to local or cheap cloud models, with model scoring, guardrails, and cost-saved tracking.
      53
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    Context Every Agent Can ShareAgents share what they learn, hand off work, and keep it when you switch models. Start with 5 GB free.fulcradynamics.comAd

    TDQS

    A3.6/5.0

    Scored across 2 tools

    Disambiguation3/5

    Both tools are decision/routing helpers that pick among options for the 'next step,' which creates real overlap in intent. The descriptions do distinguish them (route_next_stage selects a worker model/backend for a Herdr stage, while advise_next_action recommends among bounded development actions), but an agent could plausibly reach for the wrong one when unsure what to do next.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    Both names follow the same verb_noun pattern (route_next_stage, advise_next_action) with snake_case throughout. The convention is predictable and readable.

    Tool Count3/5

    Two tools is thin for a routing/decision server, sitting at the borderline where a set feels underdeveloped. It is not extreme, but there is little surface to work with.

    Completeness2/5

    The domain (decision routing over model catalogs and next actions) implies supporting operations like inspecting the catalog, configuring the backend, or querying available workers, none of which exist. The surface is a narrow slice with notable gaps.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources