apuracao-2026
Related Servers
Alternatives to apuracao-2026
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- FlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceEnables querying Brazilian electoral data through TSE's official API. Supports candidate searches, election information, and campaign finance records for municipalities and states.72-
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceMCP server for querying Peruvian electoral data (ONPE) including mesa results, candidate votes, and regional statistics. Enables natural language queries about the 2026 presidential election with local SQLite cache and live API fallback.-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables querying and retrieving Brazilian electoral clearance certificates (Certidão de Quitação Eleitoral) from the TSE using CPF, name, voter ID, birth date, and filiation. It provides a single read-only tool via MCP for integration with AI assistants.MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables querying Brazilian voter registration (título eleitoral) information from the official TSE source through a single read-only MCP tool.MIT
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceMCP Server for accessing 36 Brazilian public data sources and 1 agent, enabling AI agents to query government data on economy, legislation, transparency, judiciary, elections, environment, health, and more.6MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables agents to query 153 live Brazilian government data tools across federal and state sources, including economy, legislature, judiciary, elections, health, education, and more, reading directly from original APIs.MIT
TDQS
Scored across 4 tools
Tools are mostly distinct by geographic scope: listar_eleicoes (election metadata), resultado (state-level results), resumo_brasil (national presidential summary), municipio (municipal results). However, resumo_brasil overlaps with resultado when cargo=presidente and UF=BR, which could cause confusion.
One tool follows a verb_noun pattern (listar_eleicoes), while the others are nouns (resultado, resumo_brasil, municipio). The mix is readable but not a consistent convention.
Four tools are well-scoped for a focused election results server: one for metadata, three for results at different geographic levels. Each tool earns its place without redundancy.
The surface covers listing elections, state-level results, national presidential summaries, and municipal results, with support for cargo, turno, and year. Minor gaps exist, such as candidate- or party-level drilldowns, but core retrieval workflows are covered.