Skip to main content
Glama
dani-tc

MCP Chat

by dani-tc
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Remote

Related Servers

Alternatives to MCP Chat

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • MCP Chat

      AjinkyaHimanshu
      F
      license
      B
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables command-line interactive chat with Anthropic AI models, supporting document retrieval via @ references and slash commands for custom tool execution through the MCP architecture.
      2
      -

    • MCP Chat

      Ramsi-K
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A command-line interface application that enables interactive chat with AI models through the Anthropic API, supporting document retrieval, command-based prompts, and extensible tool integrations.
      -

    • MCP Chat

      0xAnkitSingh
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A command-line interface application that enables interactive chat with AI models through the Anthropic API, supporting document retrieval, command-based prompts, and extensible tool integrations.
      -

    • MCP Chat

      ashenoy95
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A command-line interface application that enables interactive chat with AI models through the Anthropic API, supporting document retrieval, command-based prompts, and extensible tool integrations.
      -

    • MCP Chat

      rayenamer
      F
      license
      B
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A command-line interface application that enables interactive chat with AI models through the Anthropic API, supporting document retrieval, command-based prompts, and extensible tool integrations.
      2
      -
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    B3.3/5.0

    Scored across 2 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    The two tools have clearly distinct purposes: one reads a document's contents, the other edits it by replacing strings. There is no overlap or ambiguity, making selection straightforward.

    Naming Consistency2/5

    The tool names use inconsistent naming conventions: 'read_doc_contents' follows snake_case, while 'edit-document' uses kebab-case. This inconsistency could confuse agents expecting a uniform pattern.

    Tool Count3/5

    With only 2 tools, the server feels minimal. While it might be intentionally scoped to read/edit operations, the low count borders on thin for a document manipulation server, though not entirely unreasonable.

    Completeness2/5

    The server only provides read and edit capabilities. Obvious lifecycle operations like create, delete, or list documents are missing, leaving significant gaps that would require external tools to complete basic document workflows.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources