Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to ledger

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Tamper-evident audit logging for AI agents. Append-only, hash-chained, optionally Ed25519-signed log. The MCP server lets an agent keep and verify a record of what it actually did.
      7
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      An MCP server providing an append-only, hash-chained evidence ledger for agent actions, where every record is a tamper-evident receipt cryptographically bound to all prior records and persisted as human-readable JSONL local state. It exposes tools to append records, verify chain integrity (pinpointing tampering), query records by actor/action/target/time, and fetch ledger stats—with no update or delete capabilities by design.
      1
      Apache 2.0
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Provides an immutable, tamper-evident audit trail for AI agents, enabling event logging with cryptographic chaining, search, verification, and statistics.
      2
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables recording agent proposals, executions, redactions and annotations into an append-only, hash-linked evidence chain, then exporting a self-contained range and verifying offline from the export's own bytes alone so a third party can check history without trusting the agent runtime or its storage.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Every agent action is recorded in a SHA-256 hash chain. Prove to clients that your agent did what it said it did. Record, query, verify, and export agent activity.
      3
      36 npm
      1
      MIT

    TDQS

    A4/5.0

    Scored across 5 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Each tool targets a distinct part of the ledger lifecycle, but verification-related tools overlap in behavior: ledger_verify, prove_my_conduct, and verify_peer_ledger all return three-valued chain verdicts. The descriptions are explicit about local vs peer vs proof use cases, so an agent can disambiguate with care.

    Naming Consistency3/5

    Naming is mixed: ledger_append and ledger_verify use a noun_verb pattern, while prove_my_conduct, verify_peer_ledger, and declare_break use verb_noun patterns. All names are snake_case and readable, but the inconsistent structural convention makes the set less predictable.

    Tool Count5/5

    Five tools is well-scoped for a specialized ledger server. Each tool covers a meaningful operation without unnecessary bloat, and the count fits comfortably within the expected range for a focused tool set.

    Completeness3/5

    The core append, verify, declare-break, proof, and peer-verification operations are present, but there is no tool to export or read the local ledger as JSONL, which verify_peer_ledger explicitly consumes. This is a notable gap that forces agents to obtain the ledger text through out-of-band means.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues