Skip to main content
Glama
redact-pdf-mcp

redact-pdf-mcp

Related Servers

Alternatives to redact-pdf-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents and users to process documents through natural language, supporting PDF operations like text extraction, redaction, splitting, form filling, annotations, and content search.
      85 npm
      62
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Detects and redacts sensitive personal information such as names, emails, phone numbers, ID numbers, and locations in text before it is processed by AI agents, using configurable mask, hash, or remove strategies.
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables agents to detect and redact PII and secrets in text, HTML, and PDF documents before they reach an LLM, with reversible placeholder, mask, or hash redaction, and to list supported detectors and redaction styles.
      4
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      This server enables the permanent removal of sensitive data, including SSNs, payment card numbers, emails, and custom terms, from local PDF documents. It provides tools to either verify potential redactions without changing the file or create a fully redacted copy.
      309 npm
      MIT

    TDQS

    A4.4/5.0

    Scored across 9 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    The async/sync pair redact_pdf vs redact_pdf_and_wait is the only real overlap, and the descriptions explicitly steer agents to the blocking variant unless parallel uploads or custom polling are needed. The two download tools are cleanly split by artifact (redacted PDF vs correspondence table), and try_demo, set_api_key, get_account_status and get_job_status each occupy a distinct niche.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    Every tool is snake_case with a leading verb (redact_, download_, get_, set_, restore_, try_), forming a predictable verb_noun pattern. Variants like redact_pdf_and_wait only extend the base name in a transparent way rather than introducing a new convention.

    Tool Count5/5

    Nine tools is well within the ideal band for a document-redaction service and each one earns its place: two redaction entry points, two download paths, job/account status, key setup, restore, and a keyless demo. Nothing looks padded or missing at the surface level.

    Completeness4/5

    The core lifecycle (submit, poll, download, pseudonymize, re-identify, demo, auth) is fully covered, which is strong for the domain. Minor gaps remain: no cancel/delete-job operation, no way to list prior jobs or redacted documents across sessions, and no explicit bulk/batch tool beyond passing multiple files to redact_pdf.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo recent community issues