Skip to main content
Glama

raw_request

Send raw GET requests to NCBI PubMed/PMC APIs for endpoints not covered by other tools, supporting E-utilities, BioC, Citation Exporter, and ID Converter services.

Instructions

Make a raw GET request to one of the four supported NCBI PubMed/PMC APIs. Safety valve for endpoints not covered by other tools.

service selects the base URL: "eutils" (E-utilities), "bioc" (BioC full text), "citexport" (Literature Citation Exporter), "idconv" (PMC ID Converter). path is appended to the service base URL (e.g. "esearch.fcgi" for eutils, "BioC_json/17299597/unicode" for bioc, "pubmed/" for citexport, "" for idconv). params is a dict of query-string parameters specific to that endpoint.

Examples: raw_request(service="eutils", path="einfo.fcgi", params={"retmode": "json"}) raw_request(service="bioc", path="BioC_xml/PMC1790863/unicode", params={})

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
pathYes
paramsYes
serviceYes

Output Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault

No arguments

Behavior3/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations provided, so description carries the burden. It specifies GET request and lists services, but does not mention error handling, rate limits, or authentication requirements, which would be helpful for a raw request tool.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is well-structured with bullet points and clear examples. Every sentence adds value; no wasted words.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness2/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Despite being complete in usage instructions, the description lacks any mention of what the tool returns (output format). Since no output schema is provided in the input, the description should hint at the response structure or error behavior.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema has 0% description coverage. The description adds meaning by explaining the purpose of each parameter, examples of correct usage, and specifics for each service, which compensates well.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states it makes a raw GET request to four supported NCBI APIs, acting as a safety valve. It distinguishes itself from sibling tools by being a raw interface.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines5/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Explicitly says 'safety valve for endpoints not covered by other tools', indicating when to use. Provides examples and explains how to construct requests with service, path, and params.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/dam2452/pubmed-mcp'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server