redmine-mcp-stateless
Related Servers
Alternatives to redmine-mcp-stateless
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseBqualityDmaintenanceMCP server for Redmine project management, enabling tools for managing projects, issues, users, time entries, groups, memberships, versions, wiki, news, attachments, search, and Agile sprints via the Redmine REST API.897 npm1MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceAn MCP server providing 63 tools to interact with Redmine instances, covering issues, projects, time entries, and wiki pages. It utilizes streamable HTTP transport and supports per-client authentication for secure management of Redmine resources.10 npm-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceA stateless MCP server for Redmine that allows users to interact with issues, time entries, wiki, projects, and more via their own API keys.4MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceA read-only MCP server for querying Redmine issue data via the Redmine REST API, designed for seamless integration with AI assistants.4 npmMIT
- AlicenseCqualityDmaintenanceModel Context Protocol (MCP) server for Redmine that provides comprehensive access to the Redmine REST API, enabling users to operate Redmine from MCP clients such as Claude Desktop.909 npmMIT
- AlicenseCqualityAmaintenanceModel Context Protocol (MCP) server for Redmine that provides comprehensive access to the Redmine REST API. It allows you to operate Redmine from MCP clients such as Claude Desktop.90405 npm27MIT
TDQS
Scored across 13 tools
Most tools have distinct purposes, but list_issues and list_issues_with_journals have significant overlap in functionality and parameters, which could cause confusion. The other tools are clearly differentiated by their target resources and actions.
All tools follow a consistent verb_noun naming pattern with snake_case throughout. The naming is predictable and readable, with clear action-resource pairs like create_issue, list_projects, and update_journal.
With 13 tools, this server is well-scoped for Redmine issue and project management. The count is appropriate, covering core operations without being overwhelming, and each tool serves a clear purpose in the domain.
The toolset provides strong coverage for issue and project management, including CRUD operations for issues, listing resources, and search. A minor gap is the lack of project creation/deletion tools, but agents can still perform core workflows effectively.