Clipboard MCP
Related Servers
Alternatives to Clipboard MCP
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceRead, write, and inspect the system clipboard across macOS, Linux (X11/Wayland), and Windows via MCP.808 npm2Apache 2.0
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceProvides clipboard access tools (get and set) for AI assistants via the Model Context Protocol, enabling seamless clipboard operations across platforms.1MIT

CrossPasteofficial
AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceOpen-source cross-device clipboard manager with a built-in MCP server. Search and retrieve clipboard history synced across all your devices, read OCR text extracted from copied images, and add new items to the clipboard.52,556AGPL 3.0- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceProvides utilities for formatting multi-line shell commands with backslashes for safe pasting and reading system clipboard content.8,436 npmArtistic 2.0
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables AI coding agents like Claude to read Windows clipboard contents (text and images) from within WSL environments, providing seamless cross-platform clipboard access through the Model Context Protocol.5-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceEnables AI agents to read and write the system clipboard in native app formats such as Slack, Mural, Figma, and Outlook without API keys. It decodes clipboard content into structured data and generates app-ready clipboard payloads.MIT
TDQS
Scored across 2 tools
The two tools have perfectly distinct purposes: one reads from the clipboard and the other writes to it. There is no overlap or ambiguity in their functions, making it impossible for an agent to confuse them.
Both tools follow a consistent verb_noun pattern (read_clipboard, write_clipboard) with clear action-object naming. The snake_case style is uniform throughout, making the tools predictable and easy to understand.
With only two tools, the server feels minimal but functional for basic clipboard operations. While it covers the essential read/write actions, it might be considered thin for a broader utility scope, though appropriate for its focused purpose.
The tools provide complete CRUD-like coverage for clipboard text operations (read and write), with no dead ends. A minor gap exists in handling non-text data or advanced features like clipboard history, but core functionality is well-covered.