Skip to main content
Glama
dagistankaradeniz

quillink-mcp

Related Servers

Alternatives to quillink-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      MCP server that provides standardized tools for querying and retrieving notes from Joplin personal knowledge manager through its API, enabling AI assistants to access and reference personal notes contextually.
      9
      -
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      MCP server for a personal notes/knowledge base that enables AI assistants to create, search, and retrieve notes using natural language. It exposes tools like create_note and search_notes, resources for each note, and a summarize_tag prompt.
      6
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Remote MCP server for Obsidian vaults, enabling secure access to markdown notes from Claude clients without the Obsidian desktop app. Provides tools for searching, reading, listing recent notes, resolving daily notes, and creating/appending notes via HTTPS.
      1 npm
      MIT
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables MCP-compatible clients such as Claude to create, link, search, explore, and synthesize atomic notes using a Markdown source of truth with an SQLite index for traversal and querying.
      -
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      MCP server for reading and searching Markdown notes in any directory, such as an Obsidian vault. It integrates with MCP clients like Claude Desktop to access note contents.
      1,052 npm
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      MCP server for AI agents to read, write, and organize notes in a local-first, human-in-the-loop note-taking app.
      1 npm
      2
      MIT

    TDQS

    A3.5/5.0

    Scored across 21 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Most tools are clearly scoped by resource and operation, but the graph family (get_note_backlinks, get_related_notes, get_note_graph, get_global_note_graph, get_graph_analysis) and the tag pair (list_tags vs list_tag_counts) have overlapping boundaries that could cause misselection without careful reading. The descriptions mostly disambiguate them, so only minor confusion remains.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All names use snake_case with a consistent verb_noun shape (get_*, list_*, search_*, export_*). No mixed conventions or vague verbs; prefixes consistently signal the operation type.

    Tool Count3/5

    21 tools is on the heavy side for a note-app integration, especially with separate local/global graph tools and overlapping tag-listing variants. The count is not extreme, but consolidation would improve scoping.

    Completeness3/5

    Read coverage is broad across notes, folders, tags, sharing, graphs, export, attachments, and organization data. However, there are no create, update, delete, move, or share operations, leaving common note lifecycle workflows as dead ends.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues