Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to cn-websearch-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Wraps the Kimi Coding Search and Fetch APIs into MCP tools for web searching and content retrieval. It enables LLMs to perform targeted searches and crawl web pages using standardized interfaces.
      1
      -
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to run web and image searches across nine engines with automatic fallback and ad filtering, fetch pages and PDFs as Markdown, and search WeChat Official Account articles — all without requiring a search account or API key out of the box. Works over stdio or Streamable HTTP with any MCP-capable client.
      5
      479 npm
      Apache 2.0
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to perform real-time web search and fetch/parse webpages into clean Markdown through DeepSeek's Search and Fetch APIs. It provides configurable summaries, scoring, and robust retries for integration with MCP-compatible assistants.
      2
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      MCP server for multi-engine web search and web page fetching, supporting parallel search, content extraction, and optional LLM-powered search summarization and deep search.
      4
      MIT
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to perform unified web research through a single MCP server, including search, page fetching, recursive crawling, document parsing, YouTube transcript extraction, and deep multi-query research.
      3
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A plug-and-play MCP toolkit providing AI agents with web search (Chinese sources prioritized), file operations, and shell command execution capabilities.
      2
      MIT

    TDQS

    A4.4/5.0

    Scored across 2 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    The two tools are clearly distinct: web_search performs searches, while provider_status reads configuration and provider health. There is no overlap or ambiguity between them.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Both names are concise, readable, and use snake_case consistently. web_search follows a verb_noun pattern while provider_status is noun-based, but they remain predictable and clearly tied to the server's purpose.

    Tool Count3/5

    With only two tools, the server sits at the low end of acceptable scope. It feels slightly thin, but the narrow search-focused purpose makes the minimal count defensible.

    Completeness5/5

    The domain is a stateless web search service, and the two tools fully cover its needs: performing searches and checking provider status/configuration. There are no obvious dead ends or missing lifecycle operations.

    Maintenance

    ActivityActive
    ResponsivenessWithin a week