qfbsolve
Find integer solutions to Q(x) = n for a given binary quadratic form Q.
Instructions
Solve Q(x) = n for binary quadratic form Q.
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| Q | Yes | Binary quadratic form. | |
| n | Yes | Integer to represent. |
Find integer solutions to Q(x) = n for a given binary quadratic form Q.
Solve Q(x) = n for binary quadratic form Q.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| Q | Yes | Binary quadratic form. | |
| n | Yes | Integer to represent. |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations are provided, and the description does not disclose any behavioral traits such as side effects, return format, or requirements beyond the parameter names.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is a single concise sentence with no wasted words, front-loading the action and resource.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Lacks details about return values (e.g., does it return solutions, a boolean, or an error?), and no output schema is provided, leaving the agent uncertain about what to expect.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema description coverage is 100% with basic descriptions for Q and n; the tool description adds no additional meaning beyond what the schema provides.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description uses a specific verb 'Solve' and identifies the resource as 'Q(x) = n for binary quadratic form Q', clearly distinguishing it from siblings like qfbclassno.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use this tool vs alternatives (e.g., qfbclassno, quadratic_forms), nor any context on preconditions or exclusions.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/daedalus/mcp-parigp'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server