protonmail-mcp
Related Servers
Alternatives to protonmail-mcp
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables AI assistants to interact with a Proton Mail mailbox through Proton Bridge, supporting listing, searching, reading, sending, and organizing emails.-
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceEnables AI assistants to read, organize, and send Proton Mail through the local Proton Bridge, with careful gating for sending and attachment access.341Apache 2.0
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables AI assistants to send, read, search, and organize email from Proton Mail accounts via SMTP and IMAP.73 npmMIT
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceEnables AI assistants to read and search Proton Mail inbox through Proton Mail Bridge, providing tools to list mailboxes, list messages, search messages, and fetch full message bodies. Read-only, with secure certificate pinning.411 npm1MIT
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceEnables AI agents to send, read, search, and organize emails via ProtonMail using Proton Bridge. Supports MCP-compatible clients like Claude and Cursor.1716 npm4MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables AI assistants to send, read, search, and organize Proton Mail email via SMTP and IMAP through the Model Context Protocol.MIT
TDQS
Scored across 23 tools
Most tools target distinct actions, but several boundaries blur: list_labels overlaps with list_mailboxes since labels appear as folders, create_mailbox can create labels when passed a Labels/ path, and remove_label vs delete_label could easily be confused. The descriptions help, but an agent still faces real misselection risk.
The vast majority of tools follow a clear verb_noun snake_case pattern: list_emails, send_email, create_label, download_attachment. Exceptions like bridge_status and ping break the pattern slightly, but there is no chaotic mixing of styles.
23 tools is on the heavy side for a single server and falls in the borderline range where each tool must clearly earn its place. Most tools are individually justified for a full email client, but the set feels larger than ideal and could be trimmed by merging health-check or label-related operations.
The tool surface covers the core email lifecycle well: list, get, search, send, reply, forward, draft, move, delete, mark, thread, attachments, folders, and labels. Notable gaps include no way to attach files when sending or replying, and no label rename/update operation, but agents can work around most of these gaps.