Skip to main content
Glama
dadamonis

protonmail-mcp

by dadamonis

Related Servers

Alternatives to protonmail-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to interact with a Proton Mail mailbox through Proton Bridge, supporting listing, searching, reading, sending, and organizing emails.
      -
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to read, organize, and send Proton Mail through the local Proton Bridge, with careful gating for sending and attachment access.
      34
      1
      Apache 2.0
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to send, read, search, and organize email from Proton Mail accounts via SMTP and IMAP.
      73 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to read and search Proton Mail inbox through Proton Mail Bridge, providing tools to list mailboxes, list messages, search messages, and fetch full message bodies. Read-only, with secure certificate pinning.
      4
      11 npm
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to send, read, search, and organize emails via ProtonMail using Proton Bridge. Supports MCP-compatible clients like Claude and Cursor.
      17
      16 npm
      4
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to send, read, search, and organize Proton Mail email via SMTP and IMAP through the Model Context Protocol.
      MIT

    TDQS

    B3.3/5.0

    Scored across 23 tools

    Disambiguation3/5

    Most tools target distinct actions, but several boundaries blur: list_labels overlaps with list_mailboxes since labels appear as folders, create_mailbox can create labels when passed a Labels/ path, and remove_label vs delete_label could easily be confused. The descriptions help, but an agent still faces real misselection risk.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    The vast majority of tools follow a clear verb_noun snake_case pattern: list_emails, send_email, create_label, download_attachment. Exceptions like bridge_status and ping break the pattern slightly, but there is no chaotic mixing of styles.

    Tool Count3/5

    23 tools is on the heavy side for a single server and falls in the borderline range where each tool must clearly earn its place. Most tools are individually justified for a full email client, but the set feels larger than ideal and could be trimmed by merging health-check or label-related operations.

    Completeness4/5

    The tool surface covers the core email lifecycle well: list, get, search, send, reply, forward, draft, move, delete, mark, thread, attachments, folders, and labels. Notable gaps include no way to attach files when sending or replying, and no label rename/update operation, but agents can work around most of these gaps.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues